學(xué)歷教育 - 外語類

本題答案：

正確答案：A

本題答案：

正確答案：

Crimescanbedetestable,whileminoroffendersandtheircrimesarefromtimetotimetreatedwithleniency.Thus,somearguethatlawsshouldnotdiscriminate,andequallypunishminorcriminals—anopinionthatthisessayisagainst.

Tobeginwith,minorsareyettoapproachtheirmaturity,andtheircrimes,albeitserious,shouldbepunishedwiththeconsiderationoftheiryoungage.Internationallyspeaking,countriesmightdefinethestartofadulthooddifferently—18beingthemostcommon—buttheycommonlybelievethatthereisadistinctionbetweenminorcrimesandadultcrimes.Minorsarelikelytobegivenabetterchanceforrehabilitationwhentheycommitcrimesbecauseoftheirinexperienceoflifeandpossiblybetterlifeprospects.Inthatcase,milderpunishmentsareinflictedonjuveniledelinquents:lessersentencingandrelativelylessharshcorrectionfacilitiesareintroducedintheircases.

Moreover,consideringthecorrectionprocess,minoroffendersshouldnotbepunishedequallyasadultcriminals.Despitetheabove-mentionedargumentsthatareinyoungoffenders’defense,crimes,especiallyfeloniesbyminors,deserveheavypunishmenttodetercrimesandreducetheharmofthosecrimestothesociety.However,sendingminorstoadultprisonmightentailunexpectedlynegativeresults.First,minorsarenaturallyclosertomoresophisticatedcriminalsandcrimes,whichaggravatejuveniledelinquency.Second,wheninadultcorrectionalfacilities,youngcriminalsmightbethreatenedbyassaultsbyadultprisoners,mostlysexually,whichisnowhereclosertothepurposeofrehabilitation.

Insum,lawbreakers,betheyminorsornot,shouldbepunishedfortheirwrongdoings,butlessersentencesandspecialcorrectionalfacilitiesmightbemorereasonableandhelpful.

本題答案：

正確答案：

Today,manycommercialadvertisementscanbeseeneverywhere,sellingdifferentkindsofproductssuchascosmetics,toysandclothes.Somepeopleconcernthatthewidespreadofadvertisementsmayresultinthelossofindividualityamongpeople,astheytendtowearthesameclothesandusethesamemakeup.Frommyperspective,Icompletelydisagreewiththisviewpoint.

Admittedly,peoplefromdifferentwalksoflifehavevariousconsumptionviews.However,mostpeoplewouldbudgettheirdisposableincomewiselyinsteadofwastingallinasetofclotheswithoutseriousconsideration.Therefore,despitetheproliferationofthecommercialadvertisementsforthesameluxuryproduct,peoplewouldstillmakedecisionsofbuyingornotaccordingtotheirlimitedincome.

Also,peoplearecapableofdistinguishingwhethertheclothesintheadvertisementsuitthemselvesornot.Beingexposedinaseaofadvertisementsforlong,people'simmunesystemstowardsadvertisementshavestrengthened.Consequently,fewerpeoplewouldbeswayedbythegorgeousclothesintheadvisementsastheyrealizethatmostclothesonadvertisementsonlysuitformodelsbutnotfortheaverage.

Furthermore,somanydifferentadvertisementsareprovidedforpeople'soptionthatitisfairlydifficulttobethesamewithothers.Takeclothesforexample.Therearevariousstyles,rangingfromclassicaltomodern,childishtomature,conservativetosexy.Therefore,peoplestillcouldchoosetheirfavoritestyletomeettheirdemand.

Toconclude,duetothemulti-choiceofadvertisementandpeople'swisebudget,peoplewouldnotlosttheirindividualitiesunderthestrongpromotionofthesameproductintheadvertisement.

本題答案：
The backbreaking labor of the working poor. /The bowed backs of the working poor.
The backbreaking labor of the working poor. /The bowed backs of the working poor. 解析第一段最后一句“The American Dream for the well-to-do grows from the bowed backs of the working poor，who too often have to choose between groceries and rent．”中的grows from和問題中的is built upon是一個意思。因此，本題可以用“The bowed backs of the working poor，”來回答，也可以基于理解，回答成“The backbreaking labor of the working labor”。

本題答案：
G
G 解析說者在向人介紹工作，這種工作是推售打印機。

本題答案：

正確答案：C

本題答案：
solar array
solar array 解析此處需要填入名詞性成分作from的賓語。本題考查Lewis Center中所使用的能量的來源，通過原文可知，其主要是通過太陽光線來提供能量，題干中energy source和原文powered entirely by相對應(yīng)，故此處答案為 solar array。

本題答案：

正確答案：

我們發(fā)現(xiàn)貴司產(chǎn)品在價格和質(zhì)量上能使我們的客戶滿意，我們給你下該表格中此類別的訂單

本題答案：
We often talk about the success of a country but when we stop to think about the measure of it we may find it difficult to define a clear criterion. It has long been a firm belief of some people that the criterion lies in the quality of life enjoyed by the people of a country regardless of whether it is rich or not in economic terms. According to them a country can never be called a successful one if its people have a lot to complain about the life they are living even though they have a sufficient amount of money to spend. Thus to follow their line of argumentation the government of a country should try their utmost to satisfy every need of its citizens and make them happy instead of devoting all its efforts to the economic development. However like many others who find it hard to agree fully with this opinion I tend to take the general economic strength of a country as the basis for measurement. In the first place the rich economy of a country is as far as I see it a prerequisite for the high quality life of its people. Only when a nation big or small focuses on its economic development can it provide enough jobs for its citizens who in turn can earn sufficient income to pay for their life necessities such as housing clothing food and education which are all the key parameters of a happiness formula. Secondly when it is rich a country can channel more money into the development of public facilities and amenities which obviously contribute a great deal to the life improvement of its people. In addition the wealth of a country ensures its important status in the international community. Needless to say with a strong economy a nation will have a major role to play in world affairs. For instance the United States and some other Western countries have a greater influence on the world than most of the others both politically and diplomatically simply because they have more economic edges among other things. In conclusion only when the economy of a country is developed and its people are content with their life can this country be regarded as a successful country. A happy life in a poor country is simply impossible and even unimaginable in the world today.
We often talk about the success of a country, but when we stop to think about the measure of it we may find it difficult to define a clear criterion. It has long been a firm belief of some people that the criterion lies in the quality of life enjoyed by the people of a country regardless of whether it is rich or not in economic terms. According to them, a country can never be called a successful one if its people have a lot to complain about the life they are living even though they have a sufficient amount of money to spend. Thus, to follow their line of argumentation, the government of a country should try their utmost to satisfy every need of its citizens and make them happy instead of devoting all its efforts to the economic development. However, like many others who find it hard to agree fully with this opinion, I tend to take the general economic strength of a country as the basis for measurement. In the first place, the rich economy of a country is, as far as I see it, a prerequisite for the high quality life of its people. Only when a nation, big or small, focuses on its economic development can it provide enough jobs for its citizens, who in turn can earn sufficient income to pay for their life necessities, such as housing, clothing, food and education, which are all the key parameters of a happiness formula. Secondly, when it is rich, a country can channel more money into the development of public facilities and amenities, which obviously contribute a great deal to the life improvement of its people. In addition, the wealth of a country ensures its important status in the international community. Needless to say, with a strong economy, a nation will have a major role to play in world affairs. For instance, the United States and some other Western countries have a greater influence on the world than most of the others both politically and diplomatically simply because they have more economic edges among other things. In conclusion, only when the economy of a country is developed and its people are content with their life can this country be regarded as a successful country. A happy life in a poor country is simply impossible and even unimaginable in the world today. 解析第一部分為文章的第一、二段。第一段引出話題，第二段對題目中給出的兩種觀點中的一種進行簡單討論后表明作者支持另外一種觀點，(However，like many others who find it hard to agree fully with this opinion，I tend to take the general economic strength of a country as the basis for measurement．)這一觀點構(gòu)成了文章的主題思想。
第二部分為文章的第三段，這一部分從三個方面論述了為什么說一個國家的經(jīng)濟實力是衡量一個國家成功與否的標(biāo)準。值得注意的是，作者在論述自己觀點的同時批判了國家是否成功與金錢多少無關(guān)的看法。
第三部分為文章的第四段，作者對全文作出總結(jié)，這一部分與第二段最后的thesis statement在內(nèi)容上是一致的，但從語言表達上作者最大限度地避免了重復(fù)，這就有效地增加了詞匯的范圍以及句子結(jié)構(gòu)的多樣性。

本題答案：

正確答案：

我們給你報了個好價格，我們不想再做任何讓步，接受與否，你看著辦吧。